News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257579
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122988
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: pollyvonwog post# 157428

Monday, 02/25/2013 7:14:35 PM

Monday, February 25, 2013 7:14:35 PM

Post# of 257579
You’re exactly right—here’s an excerpt from MNTA’s petition to the USSC (from the FDA Law Blog referenced in jq’s post [#msg-84999708]):

The Federal Circuit [the appellate court that lifted the Lovenox injunction] has shown no willingness to correct its interpretation or to provide the needed certainty. In the absence of guidance from this Court, future panels will have two purportedly binding precedents from which to choose. District courts are left adrift with two conflicting compasses, each purporting to be definitive. Companies attempting to chart their own courses have no idea whether they are free to use patented inventions or whether such use will subject them to infringement liability. The pharmaceutical industry cannot wait for the Federal Circuit to get it right (or wrong) a third or fourth time.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today