News Focus
News Focus
Followers 69
Posts 12025
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/01/2009

Re: slyestjester post# 29194

Thursday, 02/07/2013 10:06:56 PM

Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:06:56 PM

Post# of 163761
The PE of 0.50 was chosen more for illustrative purposes to better get a point across. The lower the PE is from 1, the more unrealistic it is to expect it to be accretive. Reality is last year many share issuances were done at pps b/w 0.50 and 0.60 or a PE b/w 0.71 and 0.86 based on generally expected 2012 earnings of 70c. That would require the project those marginal funds were deployed in to generate in the first year a ROI of 116 to 140%! Impossible, as these projects take at least 1 year to complete construction (zero return in that first year) and a full 3-4 years to ramp production to full capacity. So what ROI can be expected in those 3-4 years? That would probably be acceptable if the marginal financing is limited to 10-12% of the total capex as per original plan. But in the mean time the dilution has reached more dramatic proportions (about 17% dollarwise and 50% sharewise), begging the question whether it is justifiable from a monetary point of view.The extra growth generated by marginal capex sure helps increase total earnings to some extent but it's hard to find any justification as for them to be "accretive". Impossible in light of the above discussion. The 30m+ shares issued will also dilute earnings in ALL future years by a whopping 30%+, good or bad years.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today