Verisante Technology Inc (VRS.H)

[Huggy Bear]

I very much disagree with you on this statement sir:

My point is that it does not tell a dermatologist anything they do not already know from visual inpection

The ABCD method of visual inspection and dermatologist impression of need for biopsy is highly inaccurate, whereas the Aura is highly impressive in areas of specificity, hence the reduction of actual biopsies required, both costly to the patient or the system.

The ABCD old school method of identifying suspicious skin conditions is just as good as the Aura? Hmmm, the clinical studies you now say believe are valid also clearly state that the Aura is a vast improvement over ABCD and the MelaFind as well.

Im not about to do the DD for you on that.