M. J. Shaheed's other fraudulent activities now on the table .. here is just a brief section of a recent court filing...
Under any theory of admissibility, the evidence that the government may seek to admit here—that Shaheed used Augrid for fraudulent purposes—will become relevant if Shaheed, as promised, raises an entrapment defense. Shaheed is charged with engaging in a scheme to
defraud, specifically paying kickbacks in order to obtain funding for Augrid. Shaheed’s other fraudulent conduct in running Augrid, and even his reputation in the business community, is both
relevant and admissible to demonstrate Shaheed’s predisposition to commit the fraud with which he is charged.
-----
Mr. Shaheed.. what are you going to do now? Claim entrapment still?