Here's a thought.
At one point in time SEO was much more involved with ERHC, and he secured the JDZ, EEZ, etc.
Then the DOJ issue came into play, and for the sake of the company SEO stepped down.
SEO then went on to become involved with Chrome, Blair's company, etc.
Many here were unhappy that SEO was cutting deals on Shell's old properties and other activity without also bringing ERHC into the loop.
So now the DOJ issue has been cleared with a letter from the DOJ saying the investigation is now over and ERHC has a clean bill of health.
This is an opportune time for SEO to come back into the picture with more visibility by taking control of the company.
With control may come SEO's goodies, like what he did for his other companies.
Some people think that SEO is a liability to ERHC, without providing any real rationale as to why that would be especially given that SEO is already ERHC's biggest shareholder, so does it really matter if he has control? What are you afraid of would happen? SEO has control of some of his other companies doesn't he? Aren't they doing just fine?
In fact, by having control of the company, SEO can approach suitors more easily when he ultimately sells the company for a higher price.
Imagine you are a suitor. Would you want to buy SEO's share and then have to also go through the hassle of buying the remaining shares from the illiquid OTC market just to gain control?
Wouldn't it be easier to gain control simply by buying SEO's shares alone, instead?
Krombacher
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
