Did that. You agree with mas that it's at least 2015 before Intel assumes a lead. And, we don't know if a lead will win in the market and we don't know if Intel can penetrate the architecture.
And yet you still missed the point. Intel is competitive on 32nm, even against Qualcomm on 28nm. They don't need a process lead to start winning share. They can do that starting with 32nm products today, accelerate gains with a better 22nm micro-architecture in 2014 - and all before they get the N+1 process generation in 2015.
It makes sense that PO needs to go and maybe he is taking the shot for this lag or not
No it doesn't. Paul did the best that any CEO could have done when given the same set of data and variables. We may be a culture of punishing the scape goat, but that doesn't make it the sensible thing to do.
Market Data 
Markets 
