The differentiation is not so critical to me. Many like to keep reminding me that I have ("worthless") FFGO shares that can, perhaps, one day be exchanged for ("unregistered") NMGL A&B shares. The Bouse and S. Copperstone shares may become ("unregistered") from administrative dissolution. Does that mean that they cannot be mined? With a 100% ownership or agreement and the proper permits, can these ("unregistered") shares lend themselves to mining?
Granted, It does become harder and harder to climb out of the "rabbit hole" if more and more obstacles are in the way. We may finally encounter an obstacle that is finally a game changer. I haven't seen that yet, in my opinion. Unregistered mining shares are not a game changer to me. I don't like it as it becomes one more difficult obstacle to overcome. If we have too many obstacles in front of us, we may have no one willing to clear them for us and climb out of this "rabbit hole." We should plan on getting legal representation long before March 12, to be safe.
As far as gold content in the mines. The assay reports may be provided to prospective buyers privately IF there is any effort by NMGL to sell them?? Lack of public disclosure of the assay reports are not necessarily bad by themselves. Private negotiations and private disclosure of the assay reports is understandable. Lack of progress after 2 years is bad in and of itself. There should be some public disclosure of private negotiations after 2 years. Some purchases or filings for the remaining share of the mines.
Market Data 
Markets 
