InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 2173
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/23/2010

Re: bzone3 post# 59216

Sunday, 12/02/2012 9:50:39 PM

Sunday, December 02, 2012 9:50:39 PM

Post# of 60937
It could be worse than that. In the absence of any real data, my fear is that the BOC have awarded themselves tens -- or hundreds -- of millions of shares created without stockholder approval but will suddenly appear as "stock markers" when the TM case is won. Don't be deceived. Despite having standing through his 0.01% ownership of the patent, we have no reason to think Mr. Daic is at all on our side. Every bogus "settlement" between Daic and the BOC since 2004 has been sealed away from us owners who invested in good faith. We have no clue about the true financial deals that may have been done under cover of darkness. In my more pessimistic moments I can foresee us not getting a nickel -- literally -- from what the TM suit brings, let alone any future infringement settlements. If the receiver were a professional he would already have released to us owners CLYW's financial standing, as has been true in other similar cases. It is almost a year and he remains a character of fiction to us. Alas, he is not a professional nor has he performed as one.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.