News Focus
News Focus
Followers 89
Posts 41310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/21/2006

Re: OldBen post# 207839

Sunday, 12/02/2012 4:31:15 PM

Sunday, December 02, 2012 4:31:15 PM

Post# of 221992
I have provided the lawfirm a very clear trail of what happened. I just need to help show how the lawyers can receive some tangible benefit for their efforts. Any ideas???

Ben, we all know the only asset was the WD mining stock. The divvy was based on NMGL selling 100% of the mines.

FFGO stated in the fillings NMGL had NO BUYER for the amount FFGO wanted

NMGL issued UNREGISTERED & RESTRICTED A & B shares based on NO BUYER

Both FFGO/WD and NMGL knew FFGO was a current SEC violator and would be revoked

Sloane investments stepped in and paid off all FFGO debt becoming the note holder along with the group holding the original note
( Search light ) on the 2 mining claims

FFGO was revoked

FFGO management closed up shop and abandoned the company

The agreement was packed full of weasel clauses with NMGL

NMGL and Sloane are one and the same

No divvy was ever applied for by FFGO & TA

No divvy was ever issued by FFGO/WD

NO divvy was EVER PLANNED to be paid

It does not take a rocket scientists to see what happened
FFGO common share holders were conned from day one

The odds of any lawyer touching this without share holders coming up with a bunch of money

is

ZERO

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today