Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[downsideup]

I still think the patent is truly solid.

I did the DD on the patent, and all this stuff being argued now (and more) as the first step in determining if there was really a reason to consider having an interest...

I'd not ever have wasted any time here if I didn't think the patent was solid... and defensible... inspite of the efforts made to undermine it. I've not seen anything presented in the arguments recently that changes my mind about that.

T-Mobile has been trying hard to make stuff up about what the patent says, intends, or requires... trying to undermine the reality that it is solid... doing that in any way that they can that will tend to make it "fail" or that will tend to "create limits" that don't really exist, narrowing it.

The judge clearly saw through that effort made in the context of his court... which we've seen solid enough proof of in the definition the court provided... as opposed to what was presented to him.

The recent exchanges seem to make it clear CLYW isn't particularly confused about any of it, in the context.

That T-Mobile appears stuck on stupid in continuing to mindlessly repeat their own blather (even after rulings are made dismissing it) instead of addressing the content in what others are saying when that isn't what T-Mobile wants to hear... appears to be an instance of "that's my story and I'm sticking to it"... and nothing else, at this point.

Of course, perhaps that's an overly charitable way of seeing it...

How tolerant the judge will prove to be in addressing T-Mobiles' various efforts to ignore what he's saying... I guess we'll find out... but its good that the CLYW attorneys don't appear to be confused by it.