Tuesday, November 20, 2012 6:44:41 PM
FWIW I would suggest that what you are missing is that it is human nature to look at inventions made by others and say 'that's obvious' (and therefore clearly not worthy of protection) - a classic example is the concept of zero. And another is the concept of sound=vibration. And yet they are both reasonably recent discoveries.
But your examples of zero and sound vibrations are natural processes that the court has ruled—as recently as this past March in the Prometheus Laboratories case—cannot be patented.
I'd submit that MNTA's patents are quite far from just natural laws or phenomena, and therefore are patentable.
All that is needed to make a happy life is within yourself, in your way of thinking. -Marcus Aurelius
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Announces First Delivery of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) to a Major Construction Client • Mar 19, 2026 12:45 PM
ECGI Building in Crypto's Top-Performing Sector as Tokenized Real-World Assets Surge Past $26 Billion • ECGI • Mar 19, 2026 8:30 AM
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
