Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[downsideup]

My post is not an "attack" as you have mis-characterized it... I've simply pointed out obvious factual errors in your posts, which errors you acknowledge as "fact I was not aware".

In addressing the error in an instance, I provided the exact context, the direct quote, and a link to the direct quote.

Of course, in my post, I also provided you with an obvious opportunity for you to make an effort in correcting that error in fact... while pointing out what making the error meant in its implication ?

I mean, it's a pretty big error to suggest "China doesn't trust SRSR and are checking up on their claims about the rocks" instead of suggesting "China trusts SRSR, knows what's in the rocks, and are cooperating in advancing the project to the next stage" ?

So, it is not true, as you had suggested, that China has any questions about "what's in the rocks"... but they have instead demonstrated solid confidence in SRSR management and in the fact of "what's in the rocks"... by opting to proceed BOTH in continuing negotiations, and in helping to advance the project.

And, it is exactly true that SRSR's cooperation with China has now progressed to working on additional metallurgical analysis... which is not work done "verifying the samples"...

I note you did not choose to consider at all or discuss what it does mean that China is (not checking samples but are) proceeding... and doing work in metallurgical analysis...