Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[downsideup]

"You misunderstand my posts."

I don't misunderstand them... but I think you may misunderstand some of what you have been posting, or else you are grossly misinformed about a couple of things re the facts in the business and in "where things stand now"...

I've noted it a couple of times recently that you've been posting stuff about the Chinese partners still being uncertain "if there's value" ??

That's total BS, of course...

You'e not alone in posturing that the last PR (announcing that SRSR and China had agreed to ADVANCE the project to the next step, with China performing the work in metallurgy necessary for supporting the Canadian feasibility studies) is about China second guessing "if there is value" ?

"If the Chinese were to not feel secure with what is in the ground through their testing"...

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=81531225

Those posts are a gross misrepresentation of the fact...

The Chinese are not focused on "re-testing what's in the ground" at this late date...

There is not a question about IF the SRSR rocks have value... or if they have the values that have been reported.

The fact that the Chinese are still involved and are moving forward in performance of their agreed tasks... is itself a proof the values are there. They'd not be involved and negotiating a deal if SRSR didn't have the rocks, or if the rocks didn't have in them what SRSR (and independent third parties) have said they do.

We know the fact in what the values in SRSR's rocks are...

We know the fact in how those values compare to others rocks...

We also know the fact in how those values in the rocks translated into values in end products... using only the 1950's era technology that was applied in the original metallurgical studies funded by Gulf Dominion...

China is doing additional metallurgical studies...

That's because technology has advanced, and we now have different extraction technologies than were tested in the 1950's... ?

That work they are doing is not about "checking SRSR's values"... and that work is not going to invalidate the work done by the South Dakota School of Mines and Technologies (probably STILL the best mining engineering school in the U.S.) back in the 50's.

So, it would be useful to see you address a correction that properly considers all of that, along with addressing the actual purpose that exist in doing the sort of work that is being done now by the Chinese... that is NOT what you've said it is.

You might also address what completing that work will do... in terms of what it might mean in relation to the "values"... that isn't about "confirming" them...