News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 2129
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2012

Re: blue4 post# 112590

Tuesday, 11/13/2012 12:02:54 PM

Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:02:54 PM

Post# of 173290
blue4,I am still trying to sort that out. From our core pics compared to NAK, i would agree on the coloration, and being a definate porifferie the colorazation is relevant,A MATCH. However there could be an in the mix factor and it could even be greater in any of the other likely minerals found at Pebble. Meaning i didnt pay close attention to the grey colloration expressly as the (blue) copper indicator over a mass area is very well defined that it should be massive and well defined by a copper presence. Many other minerals will present as this is definately a proven "COPPER PORIFIERY" deposit. It indicates by the stratographic markings,angular strations to imply that the "BLUE" area would be widespread,which fits the ZTEM and relevance of likeness to NAK. Also i could not view any strations in the grey from our Core#1,so i dont think i can honestly answer,as i did note the grey in the NAK cores which color wise mate the BCSP,it is that perhaps to agree with you i would need a greater spance of core than we now have. Probably when they continue in spring we will get that answer. OH how we hate waiting! But remember "Patience is the virtue of a wise man",Ronald Reagen!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LBSR News