Thanks. How do we get it posted up to the yellow section. I think its important for anyone thinking about buying this stock to know the ENTIRE history for this company, and not just from the birth of the new symbol. I do not want to see the volume drop, but I do want anyone thinking about buying the stock to view the history - maybe, it will make a difference if the company principals see volume fall because new investors can see in real time the net effect of an increase in the A/S from 7 million to 1 Billion immediately following the R/S. Accordingly, instead of all the whining going on here we can warn versus cheerlead and make a change in how this company moves forward. If volume falls because newbie are not blind to the history of this company, then the company may be forced to provide more communication to us, and to rethink its strategy of huge dilution to raise money. If the company cannot raise money to pay salaries, etc., then the company will become insolvent, or be delisted, or completely switch gears and do the right thing and keep our shareholder value. No one is going to convince me that spending 3 plus million and 36 million shares to buy two mines is smart when it should be working with the assets its already has, and keeping shareholder value. After the money spent, and shares issued, the company IS NO BETTER POSITION TO GO OPERATIONAL OR SELL. They own a few more mines but are still broke. They own a few more mines but have diluted the shareholders who got them to this point. They own a few more mines but must still sell shares to pay bills. The company should have concentrated on the mill, and the mines it has instead of this shotgun and dilution approach. IMO gg
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
