While I agree with you, for the most part, about Obama possibly being better candidate on the MJ issue, I was speaking on more ofew a macro level. While I'm not really interested in going into that much of a debate on this board, I'm more than willing to.
I'm much more anti-Obama than I am pro-Romney. If I thought for a second that Johnson could come close to victory, I'd possibly back him over Mitt. It's difficult to argue that Obama has not been bad for the economy and foreign policy, especially. While I do agree that Obama is more pro-MJ, MJ comes in further down on my list than national security, which is my biggest concern. Capitalism has a way of taking care of economic downturns regardless of who is on Pennsylvania Ave, but I have to think that the business background puts the US on a faster recovery track than a Marxist con law professor (for those who think I'm bashing, read BO's book) To use a MLB analogy, if BO had been the manager of the NY Yankees for the past 4ever years, would Steinbrenner, Cashman and most importantly, the fans, extend his contract for 4 more? I seriously doubt it. I could be wrong, but I wouldn't bet on it. Just my 2 pennies.