I will disagree in one sense. You are correct that there are really two priorities here. The first is proving that the patent is valid and that T-Mobile was infringing. That is in the court's "court" (bad pun intended). Once that is done it establishes the value of the patent, which is then sold for many millions of dollars.
Anything after that, that does not result in a larger return for the shareholder, is superfluous. I really don't want to see a portion of my return spent on finding out if you really can extradite a crook from Paraguay, or foreclosing on the limited assets of managers in California. It may make some shareholders feel better, that somehow the world makes sense because the criminals are hauled out into the light of day and exposed for what they are. At this point, I really don't care. The number of managers who have screwed the pouch, from Patton on to Kyle, are all to blame, but so what?Concentrate on return to us, the shareholders, who invested our hard earned money in an idea (not a management team or a board). Let it go.