BAX/MNTA—What are your reasons for speculating that Rituxan is not one of the first three FoB’s in the MNTA/BAX agreement?
I think BAX-MNTA saw how many companies were targeting Rituxan and decided to play in a less crowded arena. An interchangeable Rituxan FoB would be a decent-selling product, despite the likely approval of CD20 “biobetters”; however, the downside of developing a Rituxan FoB and being unable to get interchangeability suggests that other FoB targets are more promising.
As you may know, I think BAX-MNTA are likely working on Humira, Orencia, and Erbitux (or at least two of these three).
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”