And yes I included from the same update that although the suit was settled with prejudice, I thought it was important for share holders that it also did cost them in way of issueing the claiments with shares as share stucture and OS is important to all share holders. There have been many other pay offs of lets just say debts be it services rendered or a investment debt besides this. So they keep giving away shares to settle debts or disputes, which changes the share structure which effects us share holders. And they also just gave themselves a nice piece of the pie that again does effect the overall share structure and share holders. I will post the link if anyone wants to see how many shares they rewarded their efforts with.
IMO THE CLAIMENTS WAS GIVEN PROPBABLY THE ONLY CHOICE THEY WERE EVER GOING TO GET, SO LIKE IT OR NOT THEY imo AGREED TO IT TO GET AT LEAST SOMETHING. I could not imagine when this was over they all went out for a beer as friends.
Again only my humble opinion. But I am going to keep it as real as I can on both points of views.