Sunday, October 07, 2012 9:32:02 PM
I don't accept logic that claims that because people tell lies about a thing in one extreme... it must makes the lies told in the opposite extreme true.
The fact is, the rocks have in them what they do, and what that is in fact, will not be altered one way or the other by unfounded claims there is less or more value there than there is.
So, I see people misrepresenting facts when claiming "the rocks have no value"... and I see people misrepresenting facts when claiming rocks still in the ground should be valued, right now, at a multiple based on the retail prices for refined minor mineral contents that haven't been proven economically recoverable at the wholesale level...
Otherwise, the proper focus in the legitimacy of claims is... it is fact that there is plenty enough information available to show the nature of the potential...
The conversation here, certainly recently, has been dominated by solid and well grounded effort in "due diligence" and very reasonable analysis based on it... and by opposing claims that are simply wrong in arguing there is no evidence of value or potential for value here.
There is no unreasonable "promotion" occurring.
There is a lot that is unreasonable in the opposite.
Those arguing that side... are either ignorant of the facts to the point of being incompetent... or they are stupid... or they are lying. My opinion is that among those who have observed the effort in doing the DD evolve here over the last few years, there are none who believe there's no value here.
The company doesn't promote the stock... and there are a few whose only objections are because that is true... as they WANT the CEO to behave like a POS pinkie CEO... and he will not.
The CEO acts as if he believes there's value being developed here... and I think that's reasonable... as the facts show there is value, and that the company is proceeding reasonably in and are succeeding in advancing their interest in it.
Making out that it would be wrong to consider the scope of "potential" that exists ? Because... being positive about things that DO appear remarkably positive... might make a stock price rise ? LOL!!! Adopting that view would defeat the purpose of the market existing... as the only reason it DOES exist is to facilitate raising capital to take risks in finding, exploring, advancing, and developing those sorts of opportunities...
The company has not been overly challenged in raising capital...
There are no problematic "toxic" financing issues... although there are "toxic" market behaviors evident... which is exactly what we're talking about ?
SRSR doesn't depend on "promotion" of the stock to fund the company's efforts...
That doesn't mean there may not be an opposite interest in others choices of market behavior...?
And, the obvious crap in the lips flapping while flogging fear, talking about dilution and reverse splits, etc., which are not real risks, here ? LOL!! I don't know for a fact if its pure ignorance, pure stupidity or purposeful lying...
But, I do know that there isn't any truth value there...
There are plenty of REAL risks in any investment...
One of them is the fact that the markets are corrupt, and that bad actors in the market are often not held to account for their bad behavior.
If they're telling the truth, and only that, of course, then, they've got nothing to worry about... other than being proven wrong in the market.
The fact is, the rocks have in them what they do, and what that is in fact, will not be altered one way or the other by unfounded claims there is less or more value there than there is.
So, I see people misrepresenting facts when claiming "the rocks have no value"... and I see people misrepresenting facts when claiming rocks still in the ground should be valued, right now, at a multiple based on the retail prices for refined minor mineral contents that haven't been proven economically recoverable at the wholesale level...
Otherwise, the proper focus in the legitimacy of claims is... it is fact that there is plenty enough information available to show the nature of the potential...
The conversation here, certainly recently, has been dominated by solid and well grounded effort in "due diligence" and very reasonable analysis based on it... and by opposing claims that are simply wrong in arguing there is no evidence of value or potential for value here.
There is no unreasonable "promotion" occurring.
There is a lot that is unreasonable in the opposite.
Those arguing that side... are either ignorant of the facts to the point of being incompetent... or they are stupid... or they are lying. My opinion is that among those who have observed the effort in doing the DD evolve here over the last few years, there are none who believe there's no value here.
The company doesn't promote the stock... and there are a few whose only objections are because that is true... as they WANT the CEO to behave like a POS pinkie CEO... and he will not.
The CEO acts as if he believes there's value being developed here... and I think that's reasonable... as the facts show there is value, and that the company is proceeding reasonably in and are succeeding in advancing their interest in it.
Making out that it would be wrong to consider the scope of "potential" that exists ? Because... being positive about things that DO appear remarkably positive... might make a stock price rise ? LOL!!! Adopting that view would defeat the purpose of the market existing... as the only reason it DOES exist is to facilitate raising capital to take risks in finding, exploring, advancing, and developing those sorts of opportunities...
The company has not been overly challenged in raising capital...
There are no problematic "toxic" financing issues... although there are "toxic" market behaviors evident... which is exactly what we're talking about ?
SRSR doesn't depend on "promotion" of the stock to fund the company's efforts...
That doesn't mean there may not be an opposite interest in others choices of market behavior...?
And, the obvious crap in the lips flapping while flogging fear, talking about dilution and reverse splits, etc., which are not real risks, here ? LOL!! I don't know for a fact if its pure ignorance, pure stupidity or purposeful lying...
But, I do know that there isn't any truth value there...
There are plenty of REAL risks in any investment...
One of them is the fact that the markets are corrupt, and that bad actors in the market are often not held to account for their bad behavior.
If they're telling the truth, and only that, of course, then, they've got nothing to worry about... other than being proven wrong in the market.
