the reason capital changes have a bad reputation in pennyland is most companies use them as a way to wipe out shareholders and continue diluting. that's why it's not uncommon to see 1:1000 splits, or even higher ratios.
that's not what's being proposed here. first of all, it's up for a vote. most penny CEOs would just do the split, without asking anyone.
furthermore, i have the feeling this paragraph in the last Q gives us our best indication of why the split is on the table: