News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257295
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: caravon post# 149707

Monday, 10/01/2012 12:58:39 AM

Monday, October 01, 2012 12:58:39 AM

Post# of 257295

The CEO mentioned that the 375-pts event took place sometimes in mid July 2012.

"The mOS for the erlotinib control arm is assumed to be 7 months."

The PhII placebo-arm had just 6% of KRAS-mutant pts. These pts have just 2.5 months mOS in the 1st-line pts. There are ~25% of KRAS-mutant pts in a general NSCLC population. ARQL mentioned that PhIII pts population would model the "real life" or mKRAS is expected to be ~ 25%.

MARQUEE's much higher mKRAS population could bring the erlotinib control arm mOS to under 6 month.

My "on a top of an envelop" calculations for the 7-months the erlotinib control arm mOS would bring the the 375-pts event to mid August for the 2-months control/drug arms mOS separation. The 6-months erlotinib control arm mOS would bring the the 375-pts event to mid July for the same 2-months control/drug arms mOS separation
.

So, do you think there is enough mKRAS in the trial, to go along with any other factors, that would cause you to not take the interim being triggered at this stage as a bearish sign?

It is very puzzling to me why MARQUUE trial has mEGFR pts population.

Are you implying this is a bearish sign as it relates to ultimate chances of the trial's success?

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today