The CEO mentioned that the 375-pts event took place sometimes in mid July 2012.
"The mOS for the erlotinib control arm is assumed to be 7 months."
The PhII placebo-arm had just 6% of KRAS-mutant pts. These pts have just 2.5 months mOS in the 1st-line pts. There are ~25% of KRAS-mutant pts in a general NSCLC population. ARQL mentioned that PhIII pts population would model the "real life" or mKRAS is expected to be ~ 25%.
MARQUEE's much higher mKRAS population could bring the erlotinib control arm mOS to under 6 month.
My "on a top of an envelop" calculations for the 7-months the erlotinib control arm mOS would bring the the 375-pts event to mid August for the 2-months control/drug arms mOS separation. The 6-months erlotinib control arm mOS would bring the the 375-pts event to mid July for the same 2-months control/drug arms mOS separation.
So, do you think there is enough mKRAS in the trial, to go along with any other factors, that would cause you to not take the interim being triggered at this stage as a bearish sign?
It is very puzzling to me why MARQUUE trial has mEGFR pts population.
Are you implying this is a bearish sign as it relates to ultimate chances of the trial's success?