InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 122
Posts 44736
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/06/2012

Re: sevenOdouble post# 64838

Friday, 09/28/2012 11:21:07 AM

Friday, September 28, 2012 11:21:07 AM

Post# of 97615
sevenodouble, so what do you think that GTGP is going to provide the SEC when the SEC asks for proof of


1. The $100 million Navy Contract? (there was no $100 million Navy Contract)

2. The $3.5 million received from the two empty public shells in the sham sublicensing transactions? (GTGP never received the $3.5 milliion)

3. The March 2012 3 day hot run in the "Cement Plant" PR'ed by GTGP? (Never happened - instead, only occurred at a small scale at the test tube level in the labs of MSE)

4. The relationship with M2 Polymer and all those test results and contracts claimed by GTGP?

5. The JV with EMHI for MBS technology that GTGP claimed was purchased by EMHI. (EMHI never purchased the MBS technology from Solucorp)

6. GTGP claimed close relationship with the EPA and DOE? (there is no close relationship between GTGP and these two government agencies)


LMAO How can the SEC conduct an investigation when they don't ask for documents huh??! Too funny! Now lets say that SEC investigates a Pr, they don't need to be in contact for that with the company because this can found in the Pr section or 8K's or online, but when they need proof to see if a claim made is true than who do you think they turn to huh?! Wow, bravo, you guessed it, the company! The SEC asks, the company provides, the company has a question, and the SEC replies, without telling them the nature of the investigation... To me and every sane logical human being that is called working together, although not to be confused as working together on a regular work floor and cracking casual jokes at the coffee machine... I hope this clears your confusion?!! wink