News Focus
News Focus
Followers 29
Posts 25865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2002

Re: SmallPops post# 62964

Wednesday, 09/28/2005 10:58:07 PM

Wednesday, September 28, 2005 10:58:07 PM

Post# of 98356
Re: I do not want to get into a pissing match with you. I just want to understand what your statement means.

I think you understand perfectly what I mean. You are just being obtuse. And even if this is not so, you are clearly splitting hairs over technicalities. For example:

Re: So when you make the statement "Part of AMD's success comes from them filling orders that Intel can't commit to" you are talking about AMDs future success? I don't understand how you are able to say AMDs future success is based on Intel. You can't predict the future

Is it ok if I am more general? How about "If Company A and Company B compete for the same market and Company A cannot supply demand, then it benefits Company B"? That's a simple and true statement. All you need to do is replace Company A with Intel and Company B with AMD, and that's exactly what I'm saying.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News