News Focus
News Focus
Followers 67
Posts 3747
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/30/2009

Re: foxwoodsfan post# 97281

Monday, 09/03/2012 10:10:46 AM

Monday, September 03, 2012 10:10:46 AM

Post# of 118206
" 9. As set forth below, Rillo and Baker intentionally and willfully aided and abetted,
and engaged in a conspiracy with the other counterclaim-defendants, for BME to file a meritless
and frivolous lawsuit in the State of New Jersey, thereby intentionally and deliberately causing
wrongful and unlawful conduct to occur in New Jersey. As a result, Rillo and Baker have
intentionally and knowingly availed themselves of the privileges and protections of the State of
New Jersey, thereby submitting themselves to in personam jurisdiction in New Jersey
specifically with respect to this matter, consistent with due process and the traditional notions of
fair play and substantial justice.
10. YAG, Yorkville, Rillo and Baker are joined as additional defendants on this
Amended Counterclaim pursuant to Rules 13(h) and 20(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure."


I think it would be more fun to wait until the above conspiracy allegation is proven, and then sue Rillo and Baker personally for triple damages on whatever value we have lost, and to seek criminal prosecution against them personally under the Federal RICO laws, if it is possible to do that. I'm not a lawyer, but I would like to see these guys pay in the most painful possible way for what they have done. There is a reason why their businesses are structured as LP and LLC...and that is for lawsuit protection, but that does not apply to them personally and the conspiracy charge if proven could make them personally liable as I understand it. That could be quite a liability for them, especially if anyone who has owned shares since 2007 could join the suit.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today