Sunday, September 02, 2012 9:39:16 PM
KT,
To me, the loan makes sense from a negotiating point of view only if the company has determined for itself -- and Oxford agrees -- that they have the ability to file for AA.
If they can't apply for AA and no acceptable deal can be reached, PPHM suddenly has no path to a PIII and they will struggle to pay back the $15M loan. They still have the possibility of a Cotara deal but, similarly, they will have lost negotiating leverage (made themselves vulnerable) having taken on the burden of the loan without a pathway to AA and revenue.
With AA they have a pathway to substantial revenue in less than a year.
Even with an AA application, there is substantial risk of regulatory and, ultimately, clinical failure, so they should partner to mitigate that risk.
Cannabix Technologies Announces First Delivery of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) to a Major Construction Client • BLOZF • Mar 19, 2026 12:45 PM
ECGI Building in Crypto's Top-Performing Sector as Tokenized Real-World Assets Surge Past $26 Billion • ECGI • Mar 19, 2026 8:30 AM
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
