I can't imagine why it would be assumed to be LESS... given that the CLYW issues, if they are sustained, are about very basic and even fundamental claims controlling a critical function... while the Apple case was mostly about the relative trivia inherent in the DESIGN patent issues ?
The AAPL case is not relevant here... mostly because AAPL did win, and CLYW hasn't and might not... or CLYW might win, but still not win all of what they want...
I think we will see a result from this process in which the CLYW patent will be validated... but, that still leaves open a question that matters about the limits that will be defined... and that will matter in determining the value.
Sometimes the issue is not if you win or lose, but what you win or lose, and how you win or lose it...
What I see in the arguments... is T-Mobile trying hard to define terms that will undermine all of the utility and thus all of the value of using "distance" as a metric... however it is that you determine the distance...
If they succeed in that... CLYW loses...
.JPG)
.JPG)
Market Data 
Markets 
