Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[brainlessone]

I think the question is even much harder than you state. I know you are not asking for my opinion, but I wanted to take exception to one phrase of yours:

But, it is the convenient destruction of a perfectly formed baby developing in a womb simply because one is unwed, or financially not prepared, or unwilling to have their lives complicated that evokes outrage in those opposed to abortion. This while there are would be parents who must wait for years for the opportunity to adopt a child.

If you use high dose sex hormone within 72 hours of possible conception there is a virtually 100% lack of implantation.
Does this qualify as abortion?

IF you take ru 486 at 3-4 weeks or so ( just when you could conceivably test postitive) when the fetus is not perfectly formed so does this count as abortion?

Logically to me it is all or none, because if you do not take that view, then physiologically you can always find some kind of logical trap. Yet if you do take the view that abortion is any destruction after conception, then this closes the door to stem cell research and makes drinking coffee a potentially murderous act.

Finally, speaking for the Hindus in America, do you have the right to impose your views in the form of a public law on all Americans?