Wildcat Resources Ltd. (Canada)

[echarters]

I think you would have a hard time convincing people you wrote in a Coherent language :)

Net hits are hard to weed for relevancy. they should have a "you know what I mean" function that reads your profile of areas of understanding/interest and only gives the Ozarkian intellect what it can make use of. Searching for "shine" from a computer in Appalachia should not unover articles about car wax, military discipline, and atomic fusion reactions.

And true enough, once hit, the hits have to sense make. Infoseek had a professional service that was mucho higher in closeness and it was 15 dollars a month. It had an annoying amount of obviously thematically indexed government reports that were being sold for serious bucks after we had already paid taxes for them.

?That? was the reason for SQL, in that it provided a way to ask the question of the base de data such that its relations or content could be analysed or reported upon by some sort of framework.

Anything can be researched if the index keys used are both unique enough to sieve out the relevant and wide enough to catch the peripheral but related, while blocking the homonymic and similar worded unrelated. You just have to add in all the butnos, and and/ors. They should have a service that teaches the art of boolean inclusion/exclusion, and has a syntopicon of familiar and related word-association heirachies for the topics of man/women. Or pay 10,000,000 monkeys to slavishly heirachically-relationally-thesaurically index the internet with more than basic categorization.

There has to be more to categories of things in life than entertainment, sports, shopping, religion and world politics.

Call it SQL-Hell.

And (the monkeys can) trash PDF documents while they are at it.

But it has to pay.

Got shekels, got curiousity?

EC<:-}