How interesting. Trying to steal HLNT's thunder after the fact by bringing up a bogus claim about the depos after the settlement. Of course, no one is going to get to see them now that the NIR case has been settled (unless Walters and Humphries continue down their paths of self destruction), so the statements "Depos made that very clear. Most didn't get to read those transscripts. Some did and they know." are meaningless, as is the implication that you have knowledge of them because you have read them.
An equally unlikely speculation could be as follows:
Humphries vs HLNT, Foster and Robinson - Partial Trial Transcript
....
Espinoza: Mr. Robinson, can you tell the court about the two different companies known as Highline Technical.
Robinson: I beg your pardon, what two companies?
Espinoza: The one registered in Idaho and the one registered in your name in Arkansas.
Robinson: They are the same corporation.
Espinoza: But one is registered in Idaho and the other under your name in Arkansas. How do you explain that?
Robinson: Highline is incorporated in the state of Idaho, and is a domestic corperation there. As it has been incorporated under the laws of Idaho, to do business in the state of Arkansas, the laws of Arkansas require that Highline be registered under the state of Arkansas as a foreign corporation, which I did do as the registered agent. They are one and the same corporation.
Espinoza: But, but,... but PD said they were two different companies.
Judge: Mr. Espinoza, are you sure you're lawyer?
...
Case Dismissed in favor of HLNT.
Not that the case would ever get that far that there would be a trial anyway. Humphries (and his financial backers) has got more to learn about the legal system. sorry, PD, there ain't no rabbits down that hole for Humphries to pull out. In fact, Humphries had best be careful, he might get bit or stung by something in that hole.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
