Seven Arts Entertainment Inc (SAPX)

[infiniteloop]

How are Details proof that I'm shorting? Wouldn't I want others to short too, to help my position?

I couldn't afford to short. Nor would I, I think it's a bad move. I'd get margin called quickly on volatility. I don't think any pro traders would either (I'm no where near a pro trader...), risk vs reward, it's not worth it. Margin account would lock up too much money. So, yes, I try to look for other reasons to explain why the "trading patterns" do what they do. Turns out, dilution can be most of the explanation. It has a further advantage: It can be shown to exist in filings.

I'm confused that you never seem to hear that I'm completely OK with the volatility of this stock and completely comfortable with the fact that it could go up in the short term.

It's funny that you don't address any of the points I make about it, you just say "lol, too detailed". Maybe I'm the only one who took debate in high school, who understands how to address points that are made. I'm addressing one of *your points* right now. The judge would have called this one a long time ago.

The "Details" that I gave are actually the result of me reading and trying to learn about shorting... which I did primarily because you and others made a claim that shorting is occurring. You conveniently never ever ever discuss the dilution. Noooo, it's always shorts. I don't see why to listen to the arguments you raise if you won't address the known "trading pattern" that is new shares.

Hey, while we're at the whole learning thing, just for kicks go to the website you linked to and click "questions" in the menu on the left... it goes to this link:

http://failstodeliver.com/questions.aspx

Now, just for fun read "What is a Failure to Deliver? " and look at the last line starting with "therefore..."

Gasp. Not necessarily evidence of naked shorting it says? Say it ain't so. There are.... OTHER explanations for why the graph can do that?