News Focus
News Focus
Followers 215
Posts 22715
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/19/2010

Re: cyberbullymouse post# 20710

Tuesday, 08/07/2012 10:11:06 PM

Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:11:06 PM

Post# of 22919
You are not understanding the pipi discussion topic. It is about a fictitious statement that the "feds" are currently "looking for criminal activity on PIPI."

PS, many many hailed to finra as gods, when it came to pipi, and so much chatter occurred with adamant representations that finra was the sec's eyes and how they would never process a name change with a likely pending investigation. There really was not much here to investigate to begin with and now its about a year and 2 months later waiting on a the threatened Wells notice that is simply not coming.

You have also missed the point that I made about trading. The point was that finra was allegedly playing some 'colossal game' with pipi, with allowing for a name change that would lead to brokers not being able to trade it AT ALL. Scroll back to the time of the name change.

Forget about deflection and sleep, it has nothing to do with the outlandish opinion that is the current on-going topic.

Oh boy, it sure is trading, isn't it ... I don't recall ever saying whether or not FINRA would approve a name change ... constant need by some to deflect attention ... If it helps you sleep

Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today