We already know that USSIF controls a resource that enables creating a great American mining company. More strange is how long it's taken so long for others to get around to realizing that is true ? Seems to me it's even been done before, with the same property ? The first steps in that direction with USSIF were taken a LONG time ago. The mines didn't fix themselves.
What we see now isn't a "first step"... but, an belated attempt to jump to the head of the line and extract an additional 30% interest in USSIF in exchange for... doing what management should be doing anyway ? Making us the same promise we already have ?
Sprott overplaying his hand, trying to take "more" of USSIF now.
I understand why he wants it... which isn't me saying I want to give it away...
I think Sprott probably followed me here... as I've been here since 2008... telling others to "hold" while Sprott was busy working at acquiring shares...
So, my answer is... no.
Then, after "no" we can talk... when the conversation being held is somewhat more balanced.
I appreciate "the plan"... have no quibbles with it... but, the hypothetical benefit of future success is not an excuse for mispricing that sustains the underpricing that USSIF holders have been subjected to throughout the period of Sprott's effort in developing tenure, here.
USSIF has been underpriced all along...
Now, we need to "take an additional 30% off" to get a deal done ?
LOL!!!
.JPG)