News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2583
Posts 329835
Boards Moderated 23
Alias Born 04/12/2001

Re: CarltonH post# 152560

Wednesday, 07/25/2012 2:19:45 PM

Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:19:45 PM

Post# of 159799
You are correct the SEC were negligent.

Had they discharged their responsibilities properly in 2005 they would have prevented this whole saga from happening.
They did not do so and thus failed in their duty of care to investors.
I am glad we agree on that


Do we also agree that FIRST, Megas should have reported the hijacking in a timely manner?

The question is this, why having failed to revoke Bancorp when it was seriously delinquent did the SEC suddenly decide to revoke Energy Source when it was only a year behind.

It was still more than a year behind. The revocation action cites something like 19 missing filings.

Second question why go after The non existent Energy Source in 2009 when there are hundreds of companies that are seriously delinquent which have been ignored?

In recent years, the SEC has been slowly moving on those companies. I don't see why they can't do them all at once, but that's just me.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today