News Focus
News Focus
Followers 446
Posts 63590
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/26/2007

Re: jb1967lbk post# 152457

Tuesday, 07/24/2012 9:01:18 AM

Tuesday, July 24, 2012 9:01:18 AM

Post# of 159799
Of course they have influence on some companies getting revoked. Just ask the Boston SEC Office!

If a naked short seller is correct about his or her assessment of a company, then obviously they're not going to have to cover. But it's not the naked short seller that's causing these hideous companies to get their stocks revoked.



Nothing like cellar boxing a company into submission.

How badly was BCIT cellar boxed?

Please research all stocks before investing. My posts are my opinions and are not buy or sell recommendations. Always force abusive short sellers to cover above what you paid. Build wealth for fellow iHub'ers!

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today