News Focus
News Focus
Followers 320
Posts 17930
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/24/2009

Re: FD2you post# 17897

Monday, 07/23/2012 7:43:32 PM

Monday, July 23, 2012 7:43:32 PM

Post# of 21125
What an embarrassment STAU is
to investors, their families, friends whom have bought in on recommendations, to any customers, whether private or companies looking at the stock of Star Nutrition. The absence of support from Jackson and the management team is clearly lacking in ethics, regardless of their agenda. I'm pissed, I've been patient, I feel conned and embarrassed.

You have to wonder what these clowns have in mind. Really! What, an RS is going to make everything good! I think not. For the record I repost my RS concept, which is pretty self explanatory. Hey, maybe it's just the darkness before the dawn with me, but let there be no doubt about my night vision seeing nothing. Amazing sums it up. Both my stupidity for believing in the company and my intelligence for having invested. Geeeeeezzzzzzzzzzz......



REMEMBERING THE BIDWELL PARK BENCH

IS THIS WHERE WE REALLY ARE?
Float: 1,660,383,536 as of August 29, 2011
Outstanding Shares: 5,752,374,309 as of August 29, 2011
Restricted Shares: (owned by mgmt/company founders)4,091,990,773 as of August 29, 2011
Authorized Shares: (unch from 12/2009) 7,000,000,000 as of August 29, 2011

HERE IS WHAT I POSTED AS WHAT MY SUGGESTED FIX WOULD BE:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=75674392
My question, with the current share structure, what needs to happen?
Here is the iBox SS with my suggested resolution by segment in RED:

Float: 1,660,383,536 as of August 29, 2011
RS 1:5 TO 332,076,707

Outstanding Shares: 5,752,374,309 as of August 29, 2011
IN EFFECT REDUCE THE O/S TO 741,275,785

Restricted Shares (owned by mgmt/company founders): 4,091,990,773 as of August 29, 2011
RETIRE 50% OF THE SHARES AND
RS 1:5 2,045,995,387 TO 409,199,077
I think that the founders share structure is way disproportionate to what should have been reality,ludicrous and self destructive, having been excessively pumped by crazed accounting practices and needs to be brought into reality with an updated share structure aimed at benefiting both shareholders and company founders for the long term.


Authorized Shares (unch from 12/2009): 7,000,000,000 as of August 29, 2011
RETIRE 1,000,000,000 SHARES AND
REDUCE THE A/S TO 3,954,004,614 / 1:5 RS = 790,800,923



Normally when I get this fed up with a CEO and his company stock I end up selling it and putting it behind me, hopefully before it goes to NO BID as a con ASK scam. Sometimes good news finally emerges from the company and the stock runs and I'm sitting here scratching my head wondering what happened. Not that I see this happening here, but I'm not selling!


NOTE: STAU IMO is neither investment nor legal advice. In the mean time, if anyone
can explain to me how this has not been an orchestrated con, I'm all ears and eyes.
Funny thing, reminds me of a reading rabbit company I also saw as being somewhat
small town and most likely with integrity. LMAO

.

WHETHER YOU SWIM OR DROWN IS YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY AND THERE ARE
NO EXCUSES,ONLY WHATEVER YOUR RESULTS MAY BE. ENJOY LIFE IF YOU CAN!

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today