Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,473.47
(
0.37%
)
US TECH 100
28,612.40
(
0.11%
)
Dow Jones
50,579.70
(
0.58%
)
Brent Oil
101.17
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
77,224.06
(
0.28%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 796
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Nadendla

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 481
Posts 34748
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/14/2010

Nadendla

Re: ~MulaGreen~ post# 267

Saturday, 07/14/2012 1:03:38 PM

Saturday, July 14, 2012 1:03:38 PM

Post# of 796
Before the deal... hicks must have had some value..which Appleton liked and agreed for the business combination for the greater glory and profits..which later fell apart..but then.. hicks should revert back to its previous intrinsic value which attracted Appleton in the first place...whats your take on this?.


....Also if hicks by itself did not have any value ...then they would have a hard time raising the $150 million which they did ..

DD!!..Mine should not be Your Decision!..Yours should not be My Mistake!..and Vice Versa!.Lets not blame each other!.Happy trading!.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today