But Anyway-
I have seen this discussion on the various edig chat boards and have not given it serious consideration. WHY?....
These events transpired long before I bought my first edig shares. When I bought my first shares of edig in October, 1999 it was without any knowledge or concern of JABRA. I sold my position after the SHM in November of last year and have repurchased a small amount of shares early last week. I bought these shares without any concern about JABRA or any expectations that edig would ever see any additional monies (for whatever reason)from JABRA.
More to the point, the JABRA event had to pass the inspection of shareholders and the auditors years ago. Why would there be doubts on the transactions 6-10 years later, especially doubts raised by non-shareholders? Wouldn't the past shareholders or auditors have demanded an explanation or damages??? Why the ruckus now??
The only reasons why non-shareholders would discuss JABRA six years after the fact would be to cast aspersions as to the integrity of management and to spread FUD among investors. I'm sorry, but I don't see any "smoking gun" issue with an event that occurred long before I was a shareholder and has absolutely no bearing on present edig business. e.Digital is hardly immune to criticism, but this JABRA "witchhunt" is a non-event and is simply a harassment of edig shareholders and gives me considerable concern as to the motives of the posters.
AI
