Thank you for the reply I understand why you do not want to revisit discernible dot connections because there aren't any.
what would have changed the outcome >> for P2O >> is if there had been no deal with rock tenn >> or if after receipt of the sec complaint >> prior mgmt went the usual route >> of toxic financing >>
I agree with this conceptually-- JBI has a chance to succeed, but again Market Maker manipulation and Hedge Fund abusive shorting are not standing in JBI's way.
i've said for years >> that JBII has a SS to be envied they have never had to r.s >> and the SS with a new ceo in place >> is less than 100M >> based on P2O's potential >> and at this level of the co. entering commercial production >> that is *a stunningly low* OS
This all depends on what you want to compare JBI's SS to as well as to how the story gets retold over the CEO share return. JBI's share structure allows for a speculative value to keep the stock above $1. Those trading OTC true "penny" stocks might be envious, but in the overall smaller OTC and the larger broad market, it is not anything special. Plus it lost its "luster" as a "low floater," which directly correlates to the ongoing liquidity problem as supply is ever increasing while volume merely remains very low on average with the occasional spike that is quickly sold into.
it is irrelevant to me if x believe that JBI is a scam or if x believe that the prior ceo is a crook >> liar >> thief
As it is to me, please refrain from attaching that "dynamic" to this conversation.
AI
I understand why you do not want to revisit discernible dot connections because there aren't any. 
