Thank you Shelly, but I have already read the rules and do use the 'Report' link often, however, that is no guide for me as a poster because the rules are not black and white.
Here's a perfect example that just popped up during this discussion that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject company or the subject stock, yet most would consider it on-topic during a discussion of dilution:
Some confusion between traders and investors.
As a trader, yes indeed the confidence could be gone. We cannot flip that POS. As a investor, no because they delivered their product and they have more to come.
IMO, it is matter of who we are. Trader or investor?
ICPA was full of short view traders, but also long term investors. Guess who made the most cash.
Once again I welcome the dilution in any companies when I am convince that they don't use the money to buy vacation in the Bahamas.
Bottom line. HOT. HOT. HOT and 10+ bagger IMO.
I'm sure those who defend the current position would rule that the post is on-topic, yet it clearly isn't based on a strict interpretation of the (company 'good', Posters 'bad') guideline as it has nothing to do with the company nor any poster.
My posted comments are only my considered opinion based on the reality as I see it. Your reality may be different.