Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,629.29
(
0.07%
)
US TECH 100
23,689.20
(
-0.45%
)
Dow Jones
46,216.47
(
-0.02%
)
Brent Oil
101.48
(
-4.79%
)
Bitcoin
70,355.93
(
-1.25%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257259
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

DewDiligence

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 843
Posts 122799
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

DewDiligence

Member Level

Re: Regulardoc post# 144375

Sunday, 06/24/2012 6:47:19 PM

Sunday, June 24, 2012 6:47:19 PM

Post# of 257259

MNTA—why does the court enter a decision about the patents being "infringed" rather than worded that the patents are valid? Perhaps just legalese?

The Court’s ruling was that Teva’s patents are valid and that they are infringed by MNTA’s generic Copaxone.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now