News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 337
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/11/2002

Re: rollingrock post# 31490

Saturday, 02/15/2003 2:15:32 PM

Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:15:32 PM

Post# of 93862
Namequoit,

The results were published in the 10Q filings dated 11/14/03 and 08/14/02 respectively under "Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders".

Please note that the results of the proxy vote are deceptive as according to this copy of the proxy form, there is no voting category titled "against".



However this should not dissuade shareholders concerned about the veracity of the results from petitioning for a recount.

As to your question on how one might go about petitioning for a recount, I suggest asking the question to the Chairman of the Board of the company, as the Articles of Incorporation may include specific provisions speaking to the request for recount, and forwarding a copy of your petition for a recount to the Delaware Secretary of State.

EDIT: I would also seek clarification from a board member on why the proxy was absent of a "against" or "negative" category although the results account for a "negative" category. I would also inquire as to whether there is a different weighting to "negative votes" and "votes withheld" and, if there is, inquire further on why the proxy failed to provide a cateogory for "negative votes".


Any answers you receive can be corroborated with the Articles of Incorporation which should be on file with the State of Delaware.

_________________________________________________________________

"I disagree with everything you say. But I will defend to the death your right to say it." --Voltaire

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today