nameq: It was the same the previous year. I recall people being unhappy because, like you, they said they voted against some of the directors, especially Putnam and Falk.
JimC was campaigning for people to vote no on Putnam and Falk prior to the SHM and others were agreeing with him, so it's safe to assume that they got a fair number of nay votes.
Perhaps you should contact the SEC to express your concern.