M&A: I disagree with BTM’s Miller on this:
[From the same WSJ article]:
>>
The nine largest pharmaceutical companies so far have repatriated more than $100 billion -- more than any other industry -- according to David Miller, president of Biotech Stock Research. "People don't understand how much money is going to be flowing into a very small group of thinly traded companies," he says.
<<
I think relatively little of Big Pharma’s cash will go toward buyouts of small-cap biotechs. Rather, the lion’s share of the buyout money will go for the mid-cap biotech stocks that were the subject of iHub survey #24. This is not just because the mid-cap companies are bigger and will require more money to buy; I actually think more deals will be for the mid-cap companies because BP is keen on deals that will be accretive—or at worst neutral—to EPS.
Of course, it’s in Miller’s interests to pump the prospects of the small-cap biotechs that comprise the bulk of his selection universe—just as it’s in Neuroinvest's (Dr. Harry Tracy’s) interests to pump the prospects of biotechs in the CNS arena. JMHO, FWIW
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”