…can you or someone else elaborate on why CW stated that losing some in the trial might actually make them stronger in the [Copaxone patent] appeals process?
It’s not that losing an argument in the District Court is beneficial per se, but rather that the Appellate Court could render a different ruling on any specfic argument, so you don’t know the ultimate outcome until the appeal is taken. (We saw this with the Appellate Court’s lifting of the Lovenox injunction.)
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”