News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: DewDiligence post# 143217

Monday, 06/04/2012 8:10:00 PM

Monday, June 04, 2012 8:10:00 PM

Post# of 257253

If you define success from a commercial standpoint, your assertion is guaranteed. There are only so many reimbursement dollars available in the aggregate for all cancer drugs, so it’s mathematically impossible for more than a tiny percentage of these drug candidates to be commercially successful.

There are exceptions, of course; however, all told, cancer-drug candidates are a sucker bet, IMHO
.

First, like Peter, I'm heavily biased as the bulk of my biofolio is oncology-focused. But, I would submit that cancer-drug candidates may be a sucker's bet if you just plan on buying and holding long-term. I am by no means a short-term trader (you know I think TA is bunk), but there should be plenty of opportunities along the way to play the inevitable ebbs and flows in the biotech sector.

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now