Investors are not actively seeking to destroy the public's view of MDGC. Investors have done there DD and based upon the almost complete lack of selling pressure, are content with their respective investment choices.
You said I said:
So just so we understand your view... your take is that all investors are satisfied with how this string of failures has dragged out, their return on investment and the amount of transparency provided by the CEO of MDGC?
And because of that, it makes sense for Val to withhold the "new/old address" from shareholders?
Having trouble finding the similarities. LOL!
I am not a financial advisor and any of my opinions or comments should not be construed as investment advice.