News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257428
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: jq1234 post# 142670

Friday, 05/25/2012 9:41:20 PM

Friday, May 25, 2012 9:41:20 PM

Post# of 257428

Look at the N for high GPNMB (>=25%) IC group, only 8 subjects, 3 subjects in triple negative and high GPNMB IC group, so most likely N would be much less than 4 for ultra high GPNMB (>=50%) IC group, probably 0 for triple negative and ultra high GPNMB, the sample is just too small to release as another separate group. People already complain high GPNMB sample size was too small.

Thanks. That makes a lot of sense.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today