Insofar as the boundary between a polymorphism and a mutation has been arbitrarily defined as a 1% frequency for the least common allele (according to your citation), vinmantoo’s statement in #msg-75805071 does not strike me as a flat-out misstatement.
The point was that Vin was agreeing with her substantive argument (that the size of the population was so low it wouldn't show up in an epedemiological study) - and then disagreeing with the particular terms she use. She was just rebutting on the semantics issue.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.