InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 1242
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/12/2001

Re: Mattu post# 20678

Tuesday, 02/11/2003 6:18:24 PM

Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:18:24 PM

Post# of 217735
On principle i voted no to censored pump-boards, and to whether they would succeed or fail i voted no answer, because i believe the principle to be the overwhelming factor in this case, and not to be disregarded in any way ever .... but, between you and me, i doubt that such a board would attract near the interest as would a free-speech board where all views were represented

Such a board as is proposed must have, if some hypothetically demented management were ever so short-sighted as to establish it, some reasonable disclaimer presented, at the top of each post and prominently in bolded caps .... may i suggest the following -

EVERY SINGLE WORD YOU THE VIEWER SEE HERE IS DESIGNED FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF PARTING YOU THE VIEWER FROM YOUR HARD-EARNED CASH IN EXCHANGE FOR SOME XXXX.BB PAPER WE'D LIKE TO GET OFF HIGHER

... ever notice how all this absurdity comes up on bulletin board and pink sheet productions? .... hmmm .... one sincerely hopes that individuals among these herds are eventually discovering exchange-traded securities, lord knows there's ample risk in them too, just not so many looking to stifle debate





Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.